Induction of labor versus expectant management of patients with gestational hypertension at term.

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal morbidity in planned induction of labour versus expectant management in women with gestational hypertension at term. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital Quetta. Period: January 2017 to December 2017. Material & Methods: 240 pregnant women with the diagnosis of gestational hypertension with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg without proteinuria were included. Patients were equally divided into two groups; group A (the intervention group) and group B (the expectant group). In group A, cervical ripening was stimulated with use of intravaginal prostaglandins. In group B, patients were monitored until the onset of spontaneous Labour. In both groups intervention was recommended in case of non-optimal FHR, the diastolic blood pressure ≥110mmHg or the systolic blood pressure ≥170 mmHg and eclampsia. Results: Out of 120 deliveries, 87 (72.5%) delivered by vaginal and 33 (27.5%) by caesarean section in group A. While in group B, out of 120 deliveries, 66 (55%) delivered by vaginal and 54 (45%) by caesarean section. The frequency of maternal outcome like mild preeclampsia present in 15% and 40% of women in group A and in group B respectively. Severe preeclampsia was noted 7.5% and 22.5% in group A and in group B respectively. Seizures were found in 2.5% of women in group A and 10% of women in group B. Conclusion: Complications like mild and severe preeclampsia and eclampsia could be prevented by induction of labour at term and also by widespread use of prenatal care education, prompt diagnosis and treatment of gestational hypertension.